🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The final authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the bill for further review if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable debates in additional member states